|
Publications
-
The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names (with S. Levitt). Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2004.
In the 1960s Blacks and Whites chose relatively similar first names for their
children. Over a short period of time in the early 1970s, that pattern changed
dramatically with most Blacks (particularly those living in racially isolated neighborhoods)
adopting increasingly distinctive names, but a subset of Blacks actually
moving toward more assimilating names. The patterns in the data appear most
consistent with a model in which the rise of the Black Power movement influenced
how Blacks perceived their identities. Among Blacks born in the last two decades,
names provide a strong signal of socioeconomic status, which was not previously
the case. We find, however, no negative relationship between having a distinctively
Black name and later life outcomes after controlling for a child's circumstances
at birth. Read the full paper
-
An Economic Analysis of 'Acting White' (with D. Austen-Smith). Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 2005.
This paper formalizes a widely discussed peer effect entitled "acting white". "Acting White" is
modeled as a two audience signaling quandary: signals that induce high wages can be signals that
induce peer group rejection. Without peer effects, equilibria involve all ability types choosing
different levels of education. "Acting White" alters the equilibrium dramatically: the (possibly
empty) set of lowest ability individuals and the set of highest ability individuals continue to
reveal their type through investments in education; ability types in the middle interval pool
on a common education level. Only those in the lower intervals are accepted by the group.
The model's predictions fit many stylized facts in the anthropology and sociology literatures
regarding social interactions among minority group members. Read the full paper
-
Acting White. Education Next, Winter 2005.
Acting white was once a label used by scholars, writing in obscure
journals, to characterize academically inclined, but allegedly
snobbish, minority students who were shunned by their peers.
Now that it has entered the national consciousness, perhaps even its conscience, the term has become a
slippery, contentious phrase that is used to refer to a variety of unsavory social practices and attitudes and
whose meaning is open to many interpretations, especially as to who is the perpetrator, who the victim. Read the full paper
-
Is School Segregation Good or Bad? (with F. Echenique and A. Kaufman). American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May 2006.
Fifty years after the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas, racial disparities in achievement are a robust empirical reality... Read the full paper
-
A Measure of Segregation Based on Social Interactions (with F. Echenique. Forthcoming in Quarterly Journal of Economics.
We develop an index of segregation based on two premises: (1) a measure of segregation
should disaggregate to the level of individuals, and (2) an individual is more
segregated the more segregated are the agents with whom she interacts. We present an
index which satisfies (1) and (2), and that is based on agents' social interactions: the
extent to which Blacks interact with Blacks, Whites with Whites, etc. We use the index
to measure school and residential segregation. Using detailed data on friendship networks,
we calculate levels of within-school racial segregation in a sample of US schools.
We also calculate residential segregation across major US cities, using block-level data
from the 2000 US Census. Read the full paperMatlab programs to calculate the Spectral index and Indices for metropolitan areas are available here. The relevant files follow: callspec.m, blockspectral.m, neighbors.m
-
A Model of Social Interactions and Endogenous Poverty Traps. Forthcoming in Rationality and Society.
This paper develops a model of social interactions and endogenous poverty traps. The
key idea is captured in a framework in which the likelihood of future social interactions with
members of one's group is partly determined by group-specific investments made by individuals.
I prove three main results. First, some individuals expected to make group-specific capital
investments are worse off because their observed decision is used as a litmus test of group
loyalty — creating a tradeoff between human capital and cooperation among the group. Second,
there exist equilibria which exhibit bi-polar human capital investment behavior by individuals
of similar ability. Third, as social mobility increases this bi-polarization increases. The models
predictions are consistent with the bifurcation of distinctively black names in the mid-1960s,
the erosion of black neighborhoods in the 1970s, accusations of 'acting white,' and the efficacy
of certain programs designed to encourage human capital acquisition. Read the full paper
Working Papers
-
An Empirical Analysis of 'Acting White' (with P. Torelli) October 2006.
There is a debate among social scientists regarding the existence of a peer externality
commonly referred to as 'acting white.' Using a newly available data set, which allows
one to construct an objective measure of a student's popularity, we demonstrate that there
are large racial differences in the relationship between popularity and academic
achievement; our (albeit narrow) definition of 'acting white.' The effect is intensified
among high achievers and in schools with more interracial contact, but non-existent
among students in predominantly black schools or private schools. The patterns in the
data appear most consistent with a model of peer pressure in which investments in
education are thought to be indicative of an individual's opportunity costs of peer group
loyalty. Other models we consider, such as self-sabotage among black youth or the
presence of an oppositional culture, all contradict the data in important ways. Eliminating
racial differences in the relationship between popularity and achievement would have no
effect on the average student, but may explain a significant portion of the gap among high
achievers. Read the full paper
Work in Progress
|
| Last updated on: 01/23/08 |